From 5dd404492dd91306b6e924d475099627696432ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: sdbs Terra Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 22:29:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Automatic update, changed: las.reconcept.intro.md --- pages/las.reconcept.intro.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pages/las.reconcept.intro.md b/pages/las.reconcept.intro.md index 6b2133a..5314cb6 100644 --- a/pages/las.reconcept.intro.md +++ b/pages/las.reconcept.intro.md @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ #fiction #intro #facts #video #vertov -We must therefore ask how the various symbols of the world of fiction relate to their meanings. This shifts our problem to the structure of the media. If we take advantage of what was said in the first paragraph, we may answer the question as follows: Written lines relate their symbols to their meanings point by point (they “conceive” the facts they mean), while surfaces relate their symbols to their meanings by two-dimensional contexts (they “imagine” the facts they mean — if they truly mean facts and are not empty symbols). Thus, our situation provides us with two sorts of fiction: the conceptual and the imaginal; their relation to fact depends on the structure of the medium. +We must therefore ask how the various symbols of the world of fiction relate to their meanings. This shifts our problem to the structure of the media. If we take advantage of what was said in the first paragraph, we may answer the question as follows: Written lines relate their []()symbols to their meanings point by point (they “conceive” the facts they mean), while surfaces relate their symbols to their meanings by two-dimensional contexts (they “imagine” the facts they mean — if they truly mean facts and are not empty symbols). Thus, our situation provides us with two sorts of fiction: the conceptual and the imaginal; their relation to fact depends on the structure of the medium. #intro #dimension Written lines relate their symbols to their meanings point by point (they “conceive” the facts they mean), while surfaces relate their symbols to their meanings by two-dimensional contexts (they “imagine” the facts they mean—if they truly mean facts and are not empty symbols).