Automatic update, changed: las.future.md, las.missing.md, las.quotes.md

pages/las.future.md

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ _**“Everything is related to everything else, but near things are more related
 	- Warburg
 - Cities theme [[las.quotes.cities]]
 - temporality theme
-	- //as proposed
+	- //as proposed #fill
 		- txt gifs 
 	- +
 - aarseth / ergodic literature 

pages/las.missing.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 - [ ] themes 
 	- [ ] maps
 	- [ ] alphabet
-	- [ ]  eternal network
+	- [ ] eternal network
 - [x] credits
 - [ ] sounds
 	- [ ] nedory satori sitarbanjo
@@ -19,41 +19,19 @@
 
 ---------------------------------------
 
->Let us, then, recapitulate our argument, in order to try to suggest what
-form the new civilization might take. We have two alternatives before us.
-First, there is the possibility that imaginal thinking will not succeed in
-incorporating conceptual thinking. This could lead to a generalized de-
-politicization, deactivation, and alienation of humankind, to the victory
-of the consumer society, and to the totalitarianism of the mass media.
-Such a development would look very much like the present mass culture,
-but in more exaggerated or gross form. The culture of the elite would dis-
-appear for good, thus bringing history to an end in any meaningful sense
-of that term. The second possibility is that imaginal thinking will succeed
-in incorporating conceptual thinking. This would lead to new types of
-communication in which man consciously assumes the structural posi-
-tion. Science would then be no longer merely discursive and conceptual,
-but would have recourse to imaginal models. Art would no longer work
-at things (“oeuvres”), but would propose models. Politics would no
-longer fight for the realizations of values, but would elaborate manipula-
-ble hierarchies of models of behavior. All this would mean, in short, that
-a new sense of reality
+>Let us, then, recapitulate our argument, in order to try to suggest what form the new civilization might take. We have two alternatives before us.
+First, there is the possibility that imaginal thinking will not succeed in incorporating conceptual thinking. This could lead to a generalized depolitization, deactivation, and alienation of humankind, to the victory of the consumer society, and to the totalitarianism of the mass media.
+Such a development would look very much like the present mass culture, but in more exaggerated or gross form. The culture of the elite would disappear for good, thus bringing history to an end in any meaningful sense of that term. The second possibility is that imaginal thinking will succeed in incorporating conceptual thinking. This would lead to new types of communication in which man consciously assumes the structural position. Science would then be no longer merely discursive and conceptual, but would have recourse to imaginal models. Art would no longer work at things (“oeuvres”), but would propose models. Politics would no longer fight for the realizations of values, but would elaborate manipulable hierarchies of models of behavior. All this would mean, in short, that a new sense of reality
 >> line and surface
 
-----
->Imaginal thought was a translation of
-fact into image, and conceptual thought was a translation of image into
-concept. (First there was the stone, then the image of the stone, then the
-explanation of that image.) In the future, the situation may become thus:
-Imaginal thought will be a translation from concept into image, and con-
-ceptual thought a translation from image to concept. In such a feedback
-situation, an adequate model can finally be elaborated. **First there will be
-an image of something, then there will be an explanation of that image,
-and then there will be an image of that explanation. This will result in a
-model of something (this something having been, originally, a concept).
-And this model may fit a stone (or some other fact, or nothing).** Thus a
-fact, or the absence of a fact, will have been disclosed. There would once
-more exist a criterion of distinction between fact and fiction (fit and
-unfit models), and a sense of reality would have been recovered.
-What has just been said is not an epistemological or ontological
->>las
+#fix 
+
+----
+
+>Imaginal thought was a translation of fact into image, and conceptual thought was a translation of image into
+concept. (First there was the stone, then the image of the stone, then the explanation of that image.) In the future, the situation may become thus:
+Imaginal thought will be a translation from concept into image, and conceptual thought a translation from image to concept. In such a feedback situation, an adequate model can finally be elaborated. **First there will be an image of something, then there will be an explanation of that image, and then there will be an image of that explanation. This will result in a model of something (this something having been, originally, a concept).
+And this model may fit a stone (or some other fact, or nothing).** Thus a fact, or the absence of a fact, will have been disclosed. There would once more exist a criterion of distinction between fact and fiction (fit and
+unfit models), and a sense of reality would have been recovered. What has just been said is not an epistemological or ontological
+>>las 
 

pages/las.quotes.md

@@ -178,15 +178,10 @@ reference points in space and time, conceptions of history, geography,
 biography, politics ... 'A'
 
 ## The Absopton of Expressive
-#language
+#language #fix 
 
 However, to the extent that this encouragement proceeded as a mne-
-mic function, in other words, had already been reformed once before by
-art using preexisting forms, the act of restitution remained positioned
-between impulsive self-release and a conscious and controlled use of
-forms, in other words, between Dionysus and Apollo, and provided the
-artistic genius with the psychic space for coining expressions out of his
-most personal formal language.
+mic function, in other words, had already been reformed once before by art using preexisting forms, the act of restitution remained positioned between impulsive self-release and a conscious and controlled use of forms, in other words, between Dionysus and Apollo, and provided the artistic genius with the psychic space for coining expressions out of his most personal formal language.
 
 ----