mirror of
https://git.sdbs.cz/sdbs/digital-garden-anabasis.git
synced 2025-01-22 19:15:46 +01:00
41 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
41 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
|||
|
|
created: 2021-12-28T12:36:30 (UTC +01:00)
|
|||
|
|
tags: [twitter,twitter thread,unroll,threadreader,threads]
|
|||
|
|
source: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1474586679646195712.html
|
|||
|
|
author:
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
# Thread by @syncretizm on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
> ## Excerpt
|
|||
|
|
> Thread by @syncretizm: The problem with outliners: Parent - A - B When we want a sequential chain of thought, we nest them as equal level children under the same parent. The alternative would be a very...…
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
The problem with outliners:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Parent
|
|||
|
|
\- A
|
|||
|
|
\- B
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
When we want a sequential chain of thought, we nest them as equal level children under the same parent. The alternative would be a very ugly way:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Parent
|
|||
|
|
\- A
|
|||
|
|
\- B
|
|||
|
|
\- C
|
|||
|
|
\- ...
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This way makes more sense but looks horrible.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The maths doesn't work out either. When use method 1, A/B/C are related via an OR (x) function. In method 2, A/B/C are related via an AND (%) function. We intuitively feel this burden that something is not right. And yet we don't like going into indenting hell.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Part of the reason why I enjoyed writing in prose form in obsidian was because I didn't have to figure out whether I had to indent or write a sibling bullet. Isn't it intuitive? No it isn't, especially when you consider how a bullet is queried in future...
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In outliners, querying for a thought doesn't show you a linear progression of thought. It shows you the parent-child relationship, discarding its siblings. The problem is that a thought is multidimensional, whereas an outline only has parent-child... [![[FHbOJtiVkAQXMcw.jpg]]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FHbOJtiVkAQXMcw.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Axes of thought. An outliner only adequately shows the hierarchy axis, it is 1 dimensional. It also forces the progression axis to work in a parent-child relationship when it doesn't work that way. [![[FHbR1fDUcAQDWeY.jpg]]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FHbR1fDUcAQDWeY.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A promising approach in [@obsdmd](https://twitter.com/obsdmd) using the breadcrumbs plugin... This could work... VERY well. [![[FHba1oKVgAAX220.jpg]]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FHba1oKVgAAX220.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@mentions[@obsdmd](https://twitter.com/obsdmd) I'm getting more convinced that outliners are inferior to original Zettelkasten (using cards). Zettelkasten was essentially and originally a thread system made on paper.
|